WhiteHatJr. Trademark infringement
In this case, Pradeeep Poonia, a software-engineer based in Bangalore posted the internal communications and chats that was allegedly retrieved via hacking between the employees of Byju’s owned White Hat Jr. Poonia alleged that White Hat Jr. is a ‘Ponzi’ scheme and published defamatory information on his Youtube page ‘WhiteHat Sr’ and his twitter profile.
The plaintiffs being the registered owner of the trademarks ‘Whitehat Jr’ claimed that the defendant by using the marks ‘WhiteHat Sr’ and ‘WhiteHatPoonia’ in his tweets and by running a YouTube Channel with the name ‘WhiteHat Sr’, were infringing the plaintiff’s trade mark rights.
The defendant argued that they are not carrying on any commercial activity by using the trademark ‘Whitehat Sr’ or the similar trademark and therefore, would not amount to trademark infringement. They further contended that the allegations in the plaint do not reach the threshold of defamation.
The Delhi High Court held that defendant’s acts amount to defamation and further directed him to remove specific URLs using “WhiteHat Sr”, his specific tweets commenting about the teachers and their qualification at WhiteHat Jr and restrained him from using “WhiteHat Sr” on Youtube.
K S & Co Comment:
It is interesting to note through this judgement that even though the defendant pleaded that their act is not intended for commercial exploitation of the mark, the court did not pay heed to this argument. Hence, it is important to understand that even though you may not be using the mark in a commercial manner, it is still possible to infringe the mark by using it in an unauthorized way.
Britannia v. Sunfeast
Britannia Industries has filed a case against ITC Ltd for alleged infringement of its product packaging trademark. Britannia has alleged that ITC’s packaging for its newly launched biscuits are “deceptively similar” to Britannia’s Nutri Choice Hi-Fibre and Nutri Choice Digestive biscuits.
Blackberry and Facebook reach settlement in Patent tussle
In 2018, BlackBerry had sued Facebook for allegedly using BlackBerry inventions in its popular messaging applications. Facebook responded with a campaign to challenge the BlackBerry patents, and also filed a suit accusing BlackBerry of infringing patents for voice messaging technology. The two have however, reach
Indian generic drug maker dragged to court by Pfizer
Pharmaceutical company Pfizer has alleged infringements of its patents by generic drug maker Aurobindo as the latter is set out to make generic copies of its arthritis drug, Xeljanz.In its response, Aurobindo alleged that Pfizer’s patents are invalid, unenforceable, and will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use or sale of the generic drugs
Spotify patents “plagiarism detector”
Spotify has patented “Plagiarism Risk Detector and Interface” a method which uses artificial intelligence to detect plagiarism in music.
Trademark infringement case
A Delhi District Court in Levi Strauss & Co. vs. Dinesh, granted a permanent injunction to the Plaintiffs restraining the defendants from selling, offering for sale, marketing, advertising, distributing or dealing in/under the impugned trademark ‘LEVI’s’ with/without the ‘Two Horse Logo’ and/or House mark ‘LEVI’s’, along with compensatory damages in sum of Rs. 1 lakh lumpsum on account of unfair economic and commercial advantage which the defendants tried to gain at the expenses of the plaintiff’s reputation as well as costs towards litigation expenses in the sum of Rs. 33,000/- in favour of the plaintiff.
India’s first company to receive patent for advertising fraud detection
A data science and artificial intelligence start up, Com Olho, has received a patent for an advertisement fraud detection technology. It becomes India’s first company to receive patent for advertising fraud detection.
Follow our content on LinkedIn #ksinghaniaco
Leave a Reply